Search

Help

Page 9 of 13. Showing 127 results (0.021 seconds)

  1. SCHO0906BLBK-e-e.pdf

    Customer Contact Centre by emailing enquiries@environment-agency.gov.uk or by telephoning 08708 506506. Author(s): N.A. Beresford+, J D Appleton*, C.L
  2. EPIC_D4.pdf

    and representatives of these generic groups have been identified at the species or family level [Beresford et al., 2001]. Further discussions with regards … ] and systematized in the previous EPIC reports [Beresford et al., 2001; EPIC, 2002]. The tissue density has been assumed to be unity. For marine organisms when there were two
  3. FP6 ERICA Deliverable D7h - 15 Dec06.pdf

    , France) Consortium members: Justin Brown NRPA Boris Alfonso de los Santos Facilia David Copplestone EA Nick Beresford NERC Deborah Oughton UMB Irene
  4. EFFECTS_hinton_v2.pdf

    environmental radiation. Rad. Res. 37:1088-1094. Beresford, N.A., Copplestone, D. 2011. Effects of Ionizing Radiation on Wildlife: What knowledge have we gained
  5. D-Erica.pdf

    and application Editors: Nick Beresford, Justin Brown, David Copplestone, Jacqueline Garnier- Laplace, Brenda Howard, Carl-Magnus Larsson, Deborah Oughton … Williams UNILIV Rick Leah, Mike Wood NERC Cath Barnett, Nick Beresford, Brenda Howard WSC Claire Johnson, Steve Jones, William Marshall, Jordi Vives i Batlle
  6. Refereed papers by the Biota Modelling Group

    Vives i Batlle, J., Beaugelin-Seiller, K., Beresford, N.A., Copplestone, D., Horyna, J., Hosseini, A., Johansen, M., Kamboj, S., Keum, D-K., Kurosawa, N., Newsome, L., Olyslaegers,G., Vandenhove, H., Ryufuku, S., Vives Lynch, S., Wood, M.D., Yu. C. The estimation of absorbed dose rates for non-human biota
  7. Copplestone et. al. Considerations for the integration of human and wildlife radiological assessments JRP

    Copplestone, D.C., Brown, J.E., Beresford, N.A. 2010. Considerations for the integration of human and wildlife radiological assessments. J. Radiological Prot., 30, 283-297. A number of tools and approaches have been developed recently to allow assessments of the environmental impact of radiation on wildlife
  8. Brown et al. The ERICA Tool JER 99

    Brown, J.E., Alfonso, B., Avila, R., Beresford, N.A., Copplestone, D., Pröhl, G., Ulanovsky A. The ERICA Tool J. Environ. Radioact., 99, 1371-1383. The ERICATool is a computerised, flexible software system that has a structure based upon the ERICA Integrated Approach to assessing the radiological risk to biota
  9. Andersson et al. Proposed numerical benchmark values JER

    Andersson, P., Garnier-Laplace, J., Beresford, N.A., Copplestone, D., Howard, B.J., Howe, P., Oughton, D., Whitehouse, P. Protection of the environment from ionising radiation in a regulatory context (PROTECT): proposed numerical benchmark values. J. Eviron. Radioact., 100, 1100-1108. Criteria are needed
  10. Wood et al. Application of ERICA to the Drigg sand dunes JER 99

    Wood, M.D., Marshall, W.A., Beresford, N.A., Jones, S.R., Howard, B.J., Copplestone, D., Leah, R.T.Application of the ERICA Integrated Approach to the Drigg coastal sand dunes. J. Environ. Radioact., 99, 1484-1495. The EC-funded project 'Environmental Risks from Ionising Contaminants: Assessment and Management